ARTICLE
5 January 2018

Candidate Screening - How Far Is Too Far?

A
Appleby

Contributor

Appleby is one of the world’s leading offshore law firms, operating in 10 highly regarded and well-regulated locations. We provide comprehensive, expert advice and services across a number of key practice areas. We work with our clients to achieve practical solutions whether from a single location or across multiple jurisdictions.
If not and a check is appropriate, then consideration must be given to the level of check.
Guernsey Wealth Management
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Article originally prepared for January/February issue of Contact magazine

In the modern world where it has never been technologically easier to monitor and track the actions of employees it feels counter intuitive to be writing an article that starts from the premise that we shouldn't attempt to find out every possible detail about a potential candidate.  However, with the implementation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and equivalent legislation in both Guernsey and Jersey, for those businesses that do undertake pre-employment screening this will need to be reassessed in light of the new laws.

Probably the three key areas of screening are:

  • Criminal records and background checks;
  • Medical screening; and
  • Social media screening.

For many employers, requiring a criminal record or background check on a prospective candidate is recruitment 101, especially for those working in finance or safeguarding. At the most basic level this would include taking up references from a former employer. For more in depth screening, for example, to check if someone had a criminal record this would clearly be permitted in circumstances where there is a legal obligation to undertake such checks.  For most employers however, there will not be a legal requirement for such recruitment screening, and their requirement for this information is merely company policy.  In such circumstances employers must ask whether a search is necessary and proportionate for the role.  If it is then the first decision should be whether a declaration from the employee will suffice?  If not and a check is appropriate, then consideration must be given to the level of check.  For the vast majority of roles this should be limited to unspent convictions, the key exceptions to this being those who work with children and vulnerable adults, as well as for lawyers.

Read More

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More