ARTICLE
28 April 2020

New ESMA Guidelines On Performance Fees In UCITS And Certain Types Of AIFs

AM
Arendt & Medernach

Contributor

About Arendt

Arendt combines the entire value chain of services dedicated to Asset Managers, Banks, Insurers, Public Institutions and Private Clients operating in Luxembourg.

-Legal & Tax
-Regulatory & Consulting
-Investor Services

Legal & Tax

We assist clients in structuring and running their business from a legal and tax standpoint across Luxembourg. Our teams directly serve international clients or work in close collaboration with foreign partner law firms.

Together with our regulatory consultants and investor services experts, we bridge the gap between legal/tax advice and its implementation. We deliver best-in-class services along our clients’ business life cycles.

The 450 legal experts of Arendt & Medernach have a wealth of experience in a wide variety of specialisations. Together, they are able to advise on a complete range of 15 complementary practice areas, including Investment Management, Private Equity, Banking and Corporate Law.

On 3 April 2020, ESMA finally issued its long-awaited guidelines on performance fees in UCITS and certain types of AIFs (the "Guidelines"). If adopted by the CSSF, certain provisions in the...
European Union Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On 3 April 2020, ESMA finally issued its long-awaited guidelines on performance fees in UCITS and certain types of AIFs (the "Guidelines"). If adopted by the CSSF, certain provisions in the Guidelines will require managers to review and adapt their performance fee models in order to comply with these new rules. Prospectuses and KIIDs/KIDs will also need to be reviewed and amended in order to implement the transparency requirements introduced by the Guidelines.

The Guidelines are applicable to all UCITS and have been extended to AIFMs which market AIFs to retail investors in accordance with Article 43 of the AIFMD, with the exception of (a) closed-ended AIFs and (b) open-ended AIFs that are EuVECAs (or other types of venture capital AIFs), EuSEFs, private equity AIFs or real estate AIFs.

The main provisions of the Guidelines are as follows:

  • A set of minimum elements, as listed in the Guidelines, must be included in the performance fee calculation methodology.
  • The consistency of the performance fee model with the fund's investment objectives, strategy and policy is to be checked against the parameters provided in the Guidelines.
  • The maximum performance fee crystallisation frequency is 12 months, subject to certain exemptions.
  • A positive performance must have been accrued during the performance reference period for performance fees to be payable. For performance fee models based on a benchmark index, a performance fee could be payable where the fund has overperformed the reference benchmark but had a negative performance (if a prominent warning was provided to investors).
  • A performance reference period of at least 5 years is required for performance fee models based on a benchmark index, or for high water mark models with a performance reference period shorter than the life of the fund.
  • Adequate ex-ante disclosures with respect to performance fee models are to be included in the prospectus and the key investor document, as well as in the annual and half-yearly reports on an ex-post basis.

The aim of the Guidelines is to ensure supervisory convergence regarding performance fee structures and to set out the circumstances in which performance fees can be paid. They were issued following the Consultation Paper published by ESMA on 16 July 2019 on the proposed draft guidelines, which closed on 31 October 2019.

The Guidelines will apply as from two months following the date of their publication on ESMA's website in all EU official languages. Competent authorities will then have two months to notify ESMA as to whether they (i) comply with the Guidelines, (ii) do not comply, but intend to do so, or (iii) do not comply and do not intend to comply with the Guidelines (and the reasons for the non-compliance).

New funds created after the date of application of the Guidelines, or existing funds which introduce a performance fee for the first time after such date should comply with the Guidelines immediately.
Funds with a performance fee existing prior to the Guidelines' application date should comply with them by the beginning of the financial year, following 6 months from the application date of the Guidelines (thus giving these managers a reasonable timeline for compliance).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More