ARTICLE
3 January 2018

EMIR: Revisit Of FX Collateral Requirements

EH
ELVINGER HOSS PRUSSEN, société anonyme

Contributor

Independent in structure and spirit, Elvinger Hoss Prussen guides clients on their most critical Luxembourg legal matters. Committed to excellence and creativity in legal practice, our firm delivers the best possible advice for businesses, institutions and entrepreneurs, playing a unique role in the development of Luxembourg as a financial centre.
On 18 December 2017, the European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, EIOPA, ESMA – "ESAs") published draft Regulatory Technical Standards amending the framework of the European Market Infrastructure Regulation ...
European Union Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On 18 December 2017, the European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, EIOPA, ESMA – "ESAs") published draft Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) amending the framework of the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) with regard to the requirement to exchange variation margin for physically settled foreign exchange forward contracts ("FX Forwards"). More specifically, the amendment of the current RTS and their subsequent implementation would entail the application of the requirement to exchange variation margin for physically settled FX Forwards only to transactions between institutions, as defined in CRD IV Regulation (i.e. credit institutions and investment firms). As a result, investment funds, which are currently in scope of the variation margin requirements, would be exempt from providing variation margin for FX Forwards.

In anticipation of the adoption of these changes in European legislation, the ESAs stated on 24 November 2017 that they expect the competent authorities to apply their risk-based supervisory power in a proportionate manner regarding their day-to-day enforcement of applicable legislation (i.e. the requirement under EMIR to exchange variation margin for FX Forwards from 3 January 2017).

On this basis, the CSSF has indicated that it will not insist on UCITS and AIFs posting or collecting variation margin for their FX Forwards.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More