Alternative Performance Measures

EH
ELVINGER HOSS PRUSSEN, société anonyme

Contributor

Independent in structure and spirit, Elvinger Hoss Prussen guides clients on their most critical Luxembourg legal matters. Committed to excellence and creativity in legal practice, our firm delivers the best possible advice for businesses, institutions and entrepreneurs, playing a unique role in the development of Luxembourg as a financial centre.
On 27 January 2017, ESMA published a Q&A on its Guidelines on Alternative Performance Measures ("APMs").
Luxembourg Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On 27 January 2017, ESMA published a Q&A on its Guidelines on Alternative Performance Measures ("APMs"). These guidelines apply only to certain investment funds which fall within the scope of the Prospectus Directive1 , i.e. certain closed-ended funds.

An APM is a financial measure of historical or future financial performance, financial position, or cash flows, other than a financial measure defined or specified in the applicable financial reporting framework. Examples of APMs include: operating earnings, cash earnings, earnings before one-time charges, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA), net debt, autonomous growth or similar terms denoting adjustments to line items of statements of comprehensive income, statements of financial position or statements of cash flow.

The objective of the Q&A is to promote common supervisory approaches and practices in the application of the ESMA Guidelines on APMs and to help give issues and persons responsible for the prospectus an indication of the correct implementation of the guidelines.

As a reminder, the ESMA Guidelines on APMs apply to APMs disclosed by issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market and who are required to publish regulated information as defined by the Transparency Directive2 or persons responsible for the prospectus when publishing regulated information or prospectuses for securities.

The guidelines set the principles that issuers should follow when disclosing APMs in the prospectus or other documents such as the labelling, presentation and explanations on the use of the APMs.

The guidelines entered into force on 3 July 2016 and were implemented into the Luxembourg regulatory framework by CSSF Circular 16/636.A CSSF Press Release was also issued in December 2016 (Press Release 16/46) which reminds the issuers or persons responsible for the prospectus of their obligations when they use APMs and in which the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier ("CSSF") highlights the lack of information that it identified regarding APMs during the examination of the 2016 half-yearly financial reports.

Footnotes

1 "Prospectus Directive" refers to Directive 2003/71/EC of 4 November 2003 on the prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading, as amended.

2 "Transparency Directive" refers to Directive 2004/109/EC of 15 December 2004 on the harmonisation of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are traded on a regulated market, as amended.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More