ARTICLE
22 November 2017

Taxi Drivers With Central Headquarters Are Considered Employees For Social Security Purposes

RA
Rihm Attorneys

Contributor

Rihm Attorneys logo
Rihm Attorneys at law is a Swiss law practice with an international outlook and counseling focus around all aspects of entrepreneurship. For more than 30 years, the firm has advised and represented companies and entrepreneurs in complex transactions and restructurings, including technology transfer as well as in state court, arbitration and insolvency proceedings including mediation proceedings. Based in the centre of Zurich nearby Paradeplatz, Rihm Attorneys at law can draw upon a well-established global network of correspondent law firms in all major business centers. Through one of its partners, Prof. Dr. Karl Pilny, the firm has recently acquired a longstanding Asian practise. Our working languages are German, English, French, Italian, Japanese, Turkish, Serbo-Croatian and Albanian. According to Chambers, Best Lawyers and Who's Who Legal, Rihm Attorneys at law is leading in the fields of M&A, insolvency and employment & compensation benefits laws.
If independent taxi drivers are affiliated with a central headquarter, they are considered to be their employees, so the Swiss Federal Supreme Court in a decision of November 9, 2017. This will make them much better protected in the future.
Switzerland Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Subordination confirmed

If independent taxi drivers are affiliated with a central headquarter, they are considered to be their employees, so the Swiss Federal Supreme Court in a decision of November 9, 2017. This will make them much better protected in the future. For consumers, this decision means higher taxi prices. So far, the drivers were considered self-employed, who were connected with their headquarters only by so-called follow-up contracts.

In 2014, the Swiss Accident Insurance Institute (Suva) qualified the taxi drivers for the first time as employed persons under social security law and the head office would have to pay the social contributions accordingly.

Three drivers and a taxi center had lodged a complaint with the Zurich Cantonal Court, where they were refused This court came to the conclusion that there were numerous contractual obligations between the center and the drivers, suggesting a subordinated relationship. For example, drivers are required to attend training courses, use the name of the taxi center for their vehicle, and have rules on behavior and behavior towards customers.

Also, the notice period of three months speaks for a dependent position. In addition, the head office presents itself on the internet with offers for private individuals and companies and employs staff who are responsible for the acquisition.

Significant investment denied

Apart from the car buying, the drivers do not made any other significant investments and they have no staff, so the Swiss Supreme Court. The plaintiff argued they had invested between CHF 35'000 and CHF 50'000 when purchasing their vehicles, what must be considered an entrepreneurial risk.

However, in its judgment published on Tuesday, the Federal Supreme Court upheld the decision of the lower court. The purchase and maintenance of a taxi does not constitute a sufficient entrepreneurial risk.

The price of the purchase also corresponds to the cost of a private vehicle. Further investments for premises, personnel or advertising did not apply. Thus, the drivers, apart from the monthly administrative contribution of CHF 775 to the headquarters, would have to incur any other major fixed costs.

Far-reaching consequences for headquarters

According to Christoph Wieland, President of the Taxi Division of the Swiss Commercial Vehicle Association, up to 2' 000 taxi drivers in Switzerland are working through central headquarters.

The consequences of this highest court precedent are far-reaching for the taxi centers, their clients and their drivers. Taxi headquarters will charge more and/or perhaps earn less, whilst the taxi drivers' social protection is significantly improved, at least in the short run.

UBER indirectly affected

It is quite probable that the Swiss Supreme Court will decide similarly quite soon in a pending UBER case.  

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More