Fairness Opinions In Canadian Public M&A

F
Fasken

Contributor

Fasken is a leading international law firm with more than 700 lawyers and 10 offices on four continents. Clients rely on us for practical, innovative and cost-effective legal services. We solve the most complex business and litigation challenges, providing exceptional value and putting clients at the centre of all we do. For additional information, please visit the Firm’s website at fasken.com.
As public M&A lawyers know well, fairness opinions are an integral part of the deal process in friendly acquisitions.
Worldwide Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

As public M&A lawyers know well, fairness opinions are an integral part of the deal process in friendly acquisitions.

What U.S. cross-border lawyers may not know, however, is that Canadian market practice regarding fairness opinions recently experienced an evolution.

Whereas the Canadian approach to fairness opinions was previously more standardized, a series of critical court rulings has led to more varied approaches to fairness opinions based on situation-specific factors, including:

  • transaction value;
  • cost sensitivity;
  • the potential for a shareholder challenge; and
  • the federal, provincial or territorial corporations statute governing the transaction.

Writing in The M&A Lawyer (PDF, 186 KB) , we explore the current Canadian fairness opinion landscape for the benefit of U.S. dealmakers.

For more of Fasken's M&A insights, visit our M&A Knowledge Centre.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More