ARTICLE
7 October 2014

If Teaching And Coaching Aren’t Services, It’s Hard To Know What Is

A recent decision from the Twelfth Court of Appeals shows that Texas courts take issue with the characterization of teachers' contributions as "services."
United States Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

While there is no indication that Texas courts would dispute the value of teachers. a recent decision from the Twelfth Court of Appeals, Damuth v. Trinity Valley Community College, shows that they do take issue with the characterization of teachers' contributions as "services."

The Damuth court held that teachers/coaches do not provide the type of "services" that justify the waiver of governmental immunity under Section 271.152 of the Local Government Code. This holding has significant implications with regard to when school districts have to honor teaching/coaching contracts.

Under Damuth, school districts are immune to breach of contract actions brought by teachers and/or coaches (i.e., teachers and coaches cannot sue a school district for breach of contract after being terminated before the end of their term contract). Therefore, the duration of a term contract will no longer give districts heartburn when deciding whether to terminate a teacher or coach.

To read full article, click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
7 October 2014

If Teaching And Coaching Aren’t Services, It’s Hard To Know What Is

United States Employment and HR

Contributor

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More