CFPB Issues Circular, Warning Against Whistleblower Intimidation

SM
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

Contributor

Sheppard Mullin is a full service Global 100 firm with over 1,000 attorneys in 16 offices located in the United States, Europe and Asia. Since 1927, companies have turned to Sheppard Mullin to handle corporate and technology matters, high stakes litigation and complex financial transactions. In the US, the firm’s clients include more than half of the Fortune 100.
On July 24, 2024, the CFPB issued a circular detailing how companies may be breaking the law by requiring employees to sign broad nondisclosure agreements that could deter whistleblowing.
United States Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On July 24, 2024, the CFPB issued a circular detailing how companies may be breaking the law by requiring employees to sign broad nondisclosure agreements that could deter whistleblowing.

Under Section 1057(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act, covered persons are prohibited from terminating or otherwise discriminating against covered employees for engaging in whistleblowing activity. The term "discriminate against" encompasses a variety of adverse actions that a covered person may take against employees.

The Bureau notes that while confidentiality agreements can be entered into for legitimate purposes, such as ensuring the protection of trade secrets, they can also be worded and employed in such a way that could lead an employee to reasonably believe that they would be subject to adverse actions if they disclosed information related to suspected violations of law to government investigators. The circular states that certain confidentiality agreements may forbid the sharing of information with outside parties, with no acknowledgment of, and exception for, the exercise of whistleblower rights. A reasonable employee, who is aware of an internal or government investigation into malfeasance, may interpret their required entry into such an agreement as a threat against reporting information to the government.

The circular states that even if a company's confidentiality agreement accounts for whistleblowers, the language may not be clear, or it might be confusing. For example, an agreement that forbids sharing information with third parties "to the extent permitted by law" may technically allow whistleblowing; however, an employee, who may not know that the law forbids restrictions on whistleblowing but understands that violating the agreement could lead to adverse employment actions, might reasonably interpret the agreement as prohibiting information to a law enforcement agency or voluntarily cooperating in a government investigation.

The circular offers some guidance. It states that an employer can significantly reduce its risk of violating Section 1057 by ensuring that its agreements explicitly allow employees to communicate freely with government enforcement agencies and to cooperate in government investigations.

Putting it into Practice: The CFPB's circular serves as a policy statement under the Administrative Procedure Act. Although it does not "impose any legal requirements on external parties," the circular communicates the Bureau's interpretation of the law and indicates how it intends to proceed with supervisory and enforcement actions.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More