EPA Releases Study Of Hydraulic Fracturing's Potential Impacts On Drinking Water

B
BakerHostetler

Contributor

BakerHostetler logo
Recognized as one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler is a leading national law firm that helps clients around the world address their most complex and critical business and regulatory issues. With five core national practice groups — Business, Labor and Employment, Intellectual Property, Litigation, and Tax — the firm has more than 970 lawyers located in 14 offices coast to coast. BakerHostetler is widely regarded as having one of the country’s top 10 tax practices, a nationally recognized litigation practice, an award-winning data privacy practice and an industry-leading business practice. The firm is also recognized internationally for its groundbreaking work recovering more than $13 billion in the Madoff Recovery Initiative, representing the SIPA Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. Visit bakerlaw.com
On June 4, 2015, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released an external review draft of a report assessing the potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water.
United States Energy and Natural Resources
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Authored by: Amanda Tate, 2015 Summer Associate

On June 4, 2015, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released an external review draft of a report assessing the potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water. The report, "Assessment of the Potential Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing for Oil and Gas on Drinking Water Resources," is the government's most comprehensive investigation to date of the connection between drinking water and hydraulic fracturing. Overall, EPA did not find any evidence that current hydraulic fracturing mechanisms have had widespread, systemic impacts on drinking water resources. However, EPA did identify several potential vulnerabilities in the hydraulic fracturing process that could lead to future impacts.

The report was four years in the making, conducted based on EPA's "Plan to Study the Potential Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing on Drinking Water Resources," released in 2011. The report reviews over 950 sources, including scientific datasets and peer-reviewed literature. Currently, the report is only in draft form and is under review by EPA's Science Advisory Board before being finalized. The draft is also open to public comment until August 28, 2015.

The report assesses potential drinking water impacts in five stages of the hydraulic fracturing cycle: water acquisition, chemical mixing, well injection, flowback and produced water, and wastewater treatment and waste disposal. EPA concluded that during each stage of the process, hydraulic fracturing could have adverse effects on drinking water depending on geographical factors and the potential for discharge or spills. For example, concerns exist where a relatively high amount of hydraulic fracturing is done in areas of drought or limited water resources. Additionally, EPA noted that discharges and spills, insufficient containment, and inadequate treatment of water from hydraulic fracturing sites could result in contamination of both aboveground and belowground drinking water.

However, on balance, EPA concluded that at present, hydraulic fracturing mechanisms have not caused any extensive effects on drinking water resources. Indeed, the data shows that over the years, hydraulic fracturing has been safely done under responsible regulatory programming. EPA noted that the number of identified cases where hydraulic fracturing impacted drinking water was very small compared to the number of hydraulic fracturing wells in operation. However, EPA acknowledged that its conclusion may be limited by insufficient data about hydraulic fracturing's effects on groundwater.

The report's findings are an interesting addition to the evolving conversation about hydraulic fracturing. In EPA's press release, Dr. Thomas Burke, EPA's science advisor and deputy assistant administrator of the Office of Research and Development, called the study "critical" to identifying "how best to protect public health and ... drinking water resources."

An executive summary and full text of the report can be downloaded here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More