Missouri Farm Fights To Secure $250M Verdict

CC
Clyde & Co

Contributor

Clyde & Co  logo
Clyde & Co is a leading, sector-focused global law firm with 415 partners, 2200 legal professionals and 3800 staff in over 50 offices and associated offices on six continents. The firm specialises in the sectors that move, build and power our connected world and the insurance that underpins it, namely: transport, infrastructure, energy, trade & commodities and insurance. With a strong focus on developed and emerging markets, the firm is one of the fastest growing law firms in the world with ambitious plans for further growth.
Bader Farms' attorneys requested federal courts to uphold a $250 million punitive damages verdict against Monsanto and BASF. Bader Farms' attorneys have requested federal courts to uphold a $250...
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Bader Farms' attorneys requested federal courts to uphold a $250 million punitive damages verdict against Monsanto and BASF.

Bader Farms' attorneys have requested federal courts to uphold a $250 million punitive damages verdict against both Monsanto and BASF Corporation. The case is part of multidistrict litigation over claims of a chemical manufactured by both companies, dicamba, drifting from farm to farm and damaging crops. The briefs were filed in response to BASF's motion for judgment and motion for a new trial, arguing that Monsanto alone bears the financial burden. The verdict, which was won by Bader Farms in February, also includes $15 million in compensatory damage. BASF Corporation filed a motion to judgment, arguing the verdict should be paid by Monsanto alone. The company has stated that BASF and Monsanto "are totally separate companies and competitors, and the jury's verdict found that only Monsanto should be punished for its own conduct." Monsanto, which is owned by Bayer, issued its own statement to Law360 in response, maintaining that the verdict should be overturned because there was a lack of evidence showing Bayer's product actually cased the farm's losses, but that "if the court permits an award, there is no basis for shifting it entirely to Monsanto."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More