TTABlog Mid-Year Report: 18 Precedential Opinions Thus Far

WG
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.

Contributor

For nearly a century, Wolf Greenfield has helped clients protect their most valuable intellectual property. The firm offers a full range of IP services, including patent prosecution and litigation; post-grant proceedings, including IPRs; opinions and strategic counseling; licensing; intellectual property audits and due diligence; trademark and copyright prosecution and litigation; and other issues related to the commercialization of intellectual property.
At the midpoint of calendar year 2017, the TTAB has issued 18 precedential opinions.
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

At the midpoint of calendar year 2017, the TTAB has issued 18 precedential opinions. [Note that the TTAB counts them on a fiscal year basis]. Three surname cases continued the Board's de-emphasis on surname rareness. Two phantom mark cases and two Section 2(b) insignia cases made rare appearance on the precedential list. Another marijuana ruling confirmed the predominance of the federal Controlled Substances Act in the Board's analysis. And the certification mark TEQUILA cleared the opposition hurdle.

Section 2(a) - Deceptiveness:

Section 2(b) - Flag, Coat of Arms, or Other Insignia:

Section 2(d) - Likelihood of Confusion:

Section 2(e)(1) - Mere Descriptiveness

Section 2(e)(4) - Primarily Merely a Surname: 

Abandonment:

Application Requirements/Lawful Use/Specimen of Use:

Certification Mark Control:

Failure to Function/Phantom Mark:

Fraud:

Genericness:

Discovery/Evidence/Procedure:

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More