Trademark Trumped

WE
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP

Contributor

More than 800 attorneys strong, Wilson Elser serves clients of all sizes across multiple industries. It maintains 38 domestic offices, another in London and enjoys more extensive international reach as a founding member of Legalign Global.  The firm is currently ranked 56th in the National Law Journal’s NLJ 500.
On June 13, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court decided a case that addresses restrictions to registrable trademarks under section 2(c) of the Lanham Act.
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Ani Khachatryan (Associate-Los Angeles, CA) penned "Trademark Trumped," which was reprinted in the June 13, 2024, posting of CLM Magazine. The original article was hosted on the Wilson Elser website as a client Insight. Ani details Vidal v. Elster, a case that tackles the complex intersection between trademark registration and freedom of speech under the First Amendment. Made more interesting by the involvement of current presidential candidate Donald Trump, the USPTO initially denied registration of the proposed mark, and the Federal Circuit later reversed. However, the Supreme Court granted certiorari and reversed, concluding section 2(c) of the Lanham Act did not violate the First Amendment in this case.

Read the Article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More