ARTICLE
13 February 2023

Hermès V. Rothschild: "MetaBirkin" NFT Dispute, Brand Owners Prevail

MG
Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP

Contributor

Marshall, Gerstein & Borun is a full service intellectual property law firm that protects, enforces and transfers the intellectual property of clients in more than 150 countries worldwide.  Nearly half the Firm’s professionals have been in-house as general counsel, patent counsel, technology transfer managers, scientists or engineers, and offer seasoned experience in devising and executing IP strategy and comprehensive IP solutions. Learn more at www.marshallip.com.
A jury in the Southern District of New York entered a verdict in favor of brand owners in a hotly contested and much watched case: Hermès v. Rothschild. Brand owners...
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

A jury in the Southern District of New York entered a verdict in favor of brand owners in a hotly contested and much watched case: Hermès v. Rothschild. Brand owners and artists alike have closely been watching as the jury deliberated whether designer Mason Rothschild was liable for trademark infringement, dilution, and/or cybersquatting through his creation and use of "MetaBirkin NFTs" using digital images of fur-covered BIRKIN bags and his registration and use of the domain metabirkins.com. In what is sure to be the first of many disputes considering the scope of "real world" trademark rights, digital rights, and free speech artistic expression the jury deliberated for three days before reaching their verdict.

In this case, the jury was instructed that Hermès owned federal trademark registrations that cover both the word BIRKIN and the handbag's distinct visual appearance, and then asked to consider three separate claims (1) whether Rothschild's use of the MetaBirkin NFTs created a likelihood of confusion with Hermès' BIRKIN trademarks; (2) whether Rothschild's use of the MetaBirkin NFTs was likely to dilute the distinctiveness of Hermès' BIRKIN trademarks; and (3) whether Rothschild engaged in cybersquatting through his registration and use of the domain metabirkins.com. Finally, the jury was instructed that, if the jury determined that Rothschild was liable for any of claims (1)-(3), then they were to determine whether was henonetheless protected from liability because his creation and use of the MetaBirkin NFTs was an artistic expression protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

The jury entered judgment in favor of Hermès on each count and found that Rothschild was not protected by the First Amendment. The jury awarded $110,000 for trademark infringement and/or trademark dilution and $23,000 for cybersquatting.

After the verdict was entered, Defendant Rothschild's Twitter account (@MasonRothschild) tweeted numerous statements expressing his displeasure at the verdict and seems to suggest he will continue fighting the verdict. Stay tuned.

Tiffany will moderate a panel discussing this case and other issues related to the metaverse, NFTs, and Web 3.0 in greater detail on Wednesday, February 15, with members of the Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More