FCC Releases FNPRM On USF Contribution Reform

D
Dentons

Contributor

On April 30, 2012, the FCC released the text of its Universal Service Fund ("USF") Contribution Mechanism Reform Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking ("FNPRM").
United States Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On April 30, 2012, the FCC released the text of its Universal Service Fund ("USF") Contribution Mechanism Reform Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking ("FNPRM"). The 182-page FNPRM seeks comment on a wide scope of alternatives to the current revenues-based contribution mechanism, and does not propose the adoption of a specific plan. Among the issues raised for comment in the FNPRM are a set of alternative contribution mechanisms (including numbers-based and connections-based mechanisms), the expansion of the pool of required contributors, and the administration of the Fund.

Specifically the FCC seeks comment on:

  • The goals of USF contribution reform, with a particular emphasis on issues relating to efficiency, fairness, and sustainability;
  • Who should contribute to the fund, including:
    • whether providers of specific types of services should be required to contribute, including:
      • enterprise communications services providers;
      • text messaging providers;
      • one-way VoIP service providers;
      • broadband providers;
      • non-facilities based providers; and
      • machine-to-machine communications providers.
    • and whether the FCC has statutory authority to require contribution from such providers.
  • How contributions should be assessed, including comments on whether and how the Commission:
    • can revise and reform the current revenues-based system;
    • can instead adopt and implement connections-based contribution mechanism;
    • can instead assess contributions based on the use of telephone numbers; and or
    • adopt a hybrid-approach utilizing any combination of three approaches.
  • How the administration of the contribution mechanism can be improved, including whether the Commission should take steps to:
    • revise the reporting worksheet;
    • limit or increase the frequency of adjustment to the USF contribution factor;
    • implement a pay-and-dispute policy; and
    • provide additional oversight and accountability for the fund.
  • How contributors recover contributions from end users.

Comments are due 30 days after publication in the Federal Register; replies due 60 days after publication. A full copy of the FNPRM is available here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More