ARTICLE
25 March 2014

Nevada Supreme Court Rules On Use Tax

FR
Fox Rothschild LLP

Contributor

Who We Are

With bold growth, Fox Rothschild brings together 1,000 attorneys coast to coast. We offer the reach and resources of a national law firm combined with the personal touch and connections of a boutique firm.

Our Mission

Solving problems is our top priority. We invest the time to get to know you and understand your needs. We work hard to win every client’s loyalty. We do that by providing creative solutions and excellent client service.

In Harrah’s v. State, Dep’t of Taxation, the Nevada Supreme Court entered a ruling potentially favorable ruling on taxes for goods purchased outside of Nevada.
United States Tax

In Harrah's v. State, Dep't of Taxation, the Nevada Supreme Court entered a ruling potentially favorable ruling on taxes for goods purchased outside of Nevada. Harrah's, a Delaware corporation, purchased four passenger jets for purposes of transporting its employees and guests around the country. The jets were delivered to non-Nevada locations, and subsequently transported passengers around the country, including consistently flying to and from Nevada. Harrah's paid use tax pursuant to NRS Chapter 372 but then requested a refund, which the Nevada Department of Taxation denied. Nevada's decision was upheld by two appellate bodies before the Nevada Supreme Court took up the matter.

The Nevada use tax relates to goods purchased outside of the state but were "purchased for storage, use, or consumption, and were actually stored, used, or consumed in Nevada." The use tax does not apply under NRS 372.258 if the goods were first used in interstate commerce or were used in interstate commerce for 12 months following their purchase. The Nevada Supreme Court ultimately found that the jets met both criteria and that the use tax did not apply to Harrah's jets. The Court found that the amount of times the jets flew to and from Nevada was unimportant under the statute, largely because they mostly flew to other states and accordingly were involved in non-taxable interstate commerce.

Be careful before deciding not to pay use tax to the state because the specifics of the use of the asset will be important. Not paying use tax is a misdemeanor. That said, the Harrah's case may open the door for potential challenges to the assessment of tax on certain kinds of goods used in interstate commerce.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More