ARTICLE
24 January 2020

New Prospectus Regulation: Updated ESMA Questions And Answers (December 2019)

AO
A&O Shearman

Contributor

A&O Shearman was formed in 2024 via the merger of two historic firms, Allen & Overy and Shearman & Sterling. With nearly 4,000 lawyers globally, we are equally fluent in English law, U.S. law and the laws of the world’s most dynamic markets. This combination creates a new kind of law firm, one built to achieve unparalleled outcomes for our clients on their most complex, multijurisdictional matters – everywhere in the world. A firm that advises at the forefront of the forces changing the current of global business and that is unrivalled in its global strength. Our clients benefit from the collective experience of teams who work with many of the world’s most influential companies and institutions, and have a history of precedent-setting innovations. Together our lawyers advise more than a third of NYSE-listed businesses, a fifth of the NASDAQ and a notable proportion of the London Stock Exchange, the Euronext, Euronext Paris and the Tokyo and Hong Kong Stock Exchanges.
On 4 December 2019, ESMA published the third version of its questions and answers on the PR which entered into force on 20 July 2017, and applied in full from 21 July 2019.
European Union Corporate/Commercial Law

On 4 December 2019, ESMA published the third version of its questions and answers on the PR which entered into force on 20 July 2017, and applied in full from 21 July 2019.

The Q&A relates to the inclusion of pro forma summaries in base prospectuses, with ESMA's view being that it is not possible to include a pro forma summary in a base prospectus. The last Q&A published by ESMA on the PR was on 12 July 2019. The Q&A also relates to the application of the PR disclosure annexes where securities do not fall neatly within a specific disclosure regime. ESMA's view is that annexes which are already applicable to certain securities should be applied to the prospectus for comparable securities. Additionally, ESMA has taken the view that issuers and competent authorities should identify any additional information that need to be disclosed in order to satisfy the "necessary information test" and which might, for example, be required under another securities note or additional information annex under the PR. Issuers should therefore contact authorities in their Member State to better understand what qualifies as necessary information to be disclosed for a security where they are not certain as to which PR annexes should apply to their prospectus.

View ESMA's Q&A report here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More