ARTICLE
6 December 2018

US Securities And Exchange Commission Issues Non-Enforcement Position Regarding Security-Based Swap Business Conduct Rules

SS
Shearman & Sterling LLP

Contributor

Our success is built on our clients’ success. We have a long and distinguished history of supporting our clients wherever they do business, from major financial centers to emerging and growth markets. We represent many of the world’s leading corporations and major financial institutions, as well as emerging growth companies, governments and state-owned enterprises, often working on ground-breaking, precedent-setting matters. With a deep understanding of our clients' businesses and the industries they operate in, our work is driven by their need for outstanding legal and commercial advice.
On October 31, 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued a non-enforcement position providing market participants, for a five-year period ...
United States Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On October 31, 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued a non-enforcement position providing market participants, for a five-year period, with alternative means of compliance with certain business conduct standards for security-based swap dealers and major security-based swap participants (SBS Entities).

Although the SEC has adopted a set of business conduct standards for SBS Entities, compliance with those rules is not yet required, pending finalization of certain other rules and implementation of registration of SBS Entities. The SEC issued the statement, in advance of implementation, to address market participants' concerns regarding compliance difficulties presented by differences between the SEC's business conduct standards and those of the CFTC, which are applicable to swap transactions with swap dealers.

The statement generally addresses four categories of requirements within its security-based swap dealer business conduct rules, including:

  1. The mechanism by which an SBS Entity may determine that a non-ERISA employee benefit plan is not a "special entity," which would entitle the entity to heightened protections;
  2. Reliance on certain written representations regarding recommendations provided by a security-based swap dealer, such that the security-based swap dealer can establish that it is not acting as an advisor;
  3. Reliance on certain written representations from qualified independent representatives for purposes of satisfying the safe harbor requirements for SBS Entities acting as counterparties to special entities under Rule 15Fh-5(b); and
  4. Reliance on previously obtained written representations from a counterparty or representative relating to swaps for purposes of complying with security-based swap due diligence requirements, on the condition that the security-based swap dealer is not aware of information that would cause a reasonable person to question the accuracy of such representations.

The non-enforcement position will apply for five years following the compliance date for the SEC's forthcoming security-based swap dealer and major security-based swap participant registration rules.

The statement can be viewed at: https://www.sec.gov/rules/policy/2018/34-84511.pdf  and the SEC's press  release can be viewed at: https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2018-249.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More