ARTICLE
18 January 2017

Is There An Opening To Withdraw Or Modify Electronic Logging Device Rule?

HK
Holland & Knight

Contributor

Holland & Knight is a global law firm with nearly 2,000 lawyers in offices throughout the world. Our attorneys provide representation in litigation, business, real estate, healthcare and governmental law. Interdisciplinary practice groups and industry-based teams provide clients with access to attorneys throughout the firm, regardless of location.
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published its final electronic logging device (ELD) rule on Dec. 16, 2015, which the FMCSA claims...
United States Transport
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Lawrence Hamilton II is a Partner in Holland & Knight's Jacksonville office

Jameson Rice is an Associate in Holland & Knight's Washington, D.C. office

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published its final electronic logging device (ELD) rule on Dec. 16, 2015, which the FMCSA claims, "is intended to help create a safer work environment for drivers, and make it easier, faster to accurately track, manage, and share records of duty status (RODS) data."

An ELD synchronizes with a vehicle engine to automatically record driving time for purposes of reporting hours of service (HOS). Subject to some exceptions, the rule applies to most carriers and drivers that are required to maintain RODS. Congress mandated as part of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) that an ELD rule be enacted for drivers of commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) involved in interstate commerce that are required to keep records of duty status.1

The rule is scheduled to go into effect on Feb. 16, 2017. The compliance date is Dec. 18, 2017, after which there is a two-year phase-in period. Accordingly, beginning Dec. 16, 2019, all drivers and carriers subject to the rule must use certified and registered ELDs that comply with requirements of the ELD regulations.

A previous ELD rule had been successfully challenged in court by the Owner Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA). OOIDA also challenged the most recent ELD rule, arguing, among other issues, that it violated the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures. However, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit upheld the rule, holding that an ELD would fall within the "pervasively regulated industry" exception to the warrant requirement. In so ruling, the court found that public safety concerns inherent in commercial trucking give the government a substantial interest. The court also found that ELD records and administrative inspection of them are necessary to further the government's regulatory scheme because of the falsification and errors found in paper records. The court determined that the ELD mandate creates a constitutionally adequate substitute for a warrant in the commercial trucking industry. Accordingly, the ELD mandate was found to provide for a reasonable administrative inspection within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment.

Thus, the battle to avoid ELDs has been lost at the agency level and in court. The new Trump Administration, which is expected to be considerably less inclined toward regulation, provides the opportunity to persuade Congress to pass new legislation, delay or otherwise modify enforcement of the law.

Footnotes

1 See Section 32301(b) of the Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Enhancement Act, (Pub. L. 112-141, 126 Stat. 405, 786-788, July 6, 2012)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More