Massachusetts Right To Repair Law: One More Delay On Decision

SS
Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Contributor

With more than 900 lawyers across 18 offices, Seyfarth Shaw LLP provides advisory, litigation, and transactional legal services to clients worldwide. Our high-caliber legal representation and advanced delivery capabilities allow us to take on our clients’ unique challenges and opportunities-no matter the scale or complexity. Whether navigating complex litigation, negotiating transformational deals, or advising on cross-border projects, our attorneys achieve exceptional legal outcomes. Our drive for excellence leads us to seek out better ways to work with our clients and each other. We have been first-to-market on many legal service delivery innovations-and we continue to break new ground with our clients every day. This long history of excellence and innovation has created a culture with a sense of purpose and belonging for all. In turn, our culture drives our commitment to the growth of our clients, the diversity of our people, and the resilience of our workforce.
Citing the need to "consider fully the implications of the long anticipated decision" in West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency—which was not issued by the U.S. Supreme Court...
United States Transport
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Citing the need to "consider fully the implications of the long anticipated decision" in West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency—which was not issued by the U.S. Supreme Court until the last day of its term on June 30, 2022—the Massachusetts federal court in Alliance for Automotive Innovation v. Healy issued a notice on July 1, 2022 informing the parties that the court would not be able to meet a self-imposed deadline to issue a decision by that date on a challenge brought by an industry trade association to a right to repair ballot initiative passed by Massachusetts voters in November 2020.

The case involves a challenge to the Massachusetts Right to Repair Law, which requires that commencing with Model Year 2022 (MY22), vehicles sold in Massachusetts using telematics systems be equipped with "an inter-operable, standardized and open access platform" to enable customers and independent repair shops to access mechanical data from those systems. The court held a week-long bench trial last June, during which the industry offered evidence that compliance with these requirements by MY22 would be impossible, while the Massachusetts Attorney General's Office argued that automakers could comply with the new law by simply disabling telematics systems installed in vehicles sold in Massachusetts.

In the July 1, 2022 Notice, the court advised that the delay in issuing a decision "is not anticipated to extend beyond the grace notice period" set forth in a stipulation filed by the Massachusetts Attorney General on April 22, 2022. In that stipulation, the Massachusetts Attorney General advised that her office would not enforce the Massachusetts Right to Repair Law until the court rules on the pending challenge, and that it would not do so without first providing 14 days' advance notice. It therefore appears that the court anticipates issuing a decision no later than July 15, 2022.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More