PTAB Sets Forth Procedure For Confidential Oral Hearings

MW
McDermott Will & Emery

Contributor

McDermott Will & Emery logo
McDermott Will & Emery partners with leaders around the world to fuel missions, knock down barriers and shape markets. With more than 1,100 lawyers across several office locations worldwide, our team works seamlessly across practices, industries and geographies to deliver highly effective solutions that propel success.
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) designated as informative a decision explaining the procedure for holding oral arguments where confidential information will be discussed.
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) designated as informative a decision explaining the procedure for holding oral arguments where confidential information will be discussed. Curt G. Joa, Inc. v. Fameccanica.Data S.P.A., Case No. 2016IPR-00906 (PTAB June 20, 2017) (Chagnon, APJ).

Joa filed a petition for inter partes review against a patent owned by Fameccanica. Prior to oral argument, Fameccanica filed a motion indicating that it intended to discuss confidential information during the hearing and requesting that the PTAB close a portion of the hearing to the public.

The PTAB granted Fameccanica's motion subject to certain conditions. The PTAB stated that each side would be allocated no more than 15 minutes of argument relating to confidential information in a session closed to the public. The parties would proceed with their presentations during the closed session in the same order as their presentations in the open session. The PTAB noted that if a party wanted allocate more time to the open portion of the hearing, it could do so by informing the PTAB at the beginning of the hearing, but under no circumstances would the party be allocated more than 15 minutes during the closed session. The PTAB also directed to the parties to refrain from including any confidential information in any demonstrative exhibit. Instead, during the portion of the hearing closed to the public, the parties could direct the panel to specific confidential information being discussed by exhibit, page and line number in the record.

Originally published by McDermott, on June 2020

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More