ARTICLE
10 January 2019

USPTO Releases 2019 Eligibility Update

FL
Foley & Lardner

Contributor

Foley & Lardner LLP looks beyond the law to focus on the constantly evolving demands facing our clients and their industries. With over 1,100 lawyers in 24 offices across the United States, Mexico, Europe and Asia, Foley approaches client service by first understanding our clients’ priorities, objectives and challenges. We work hard to understand our clients’ issues and forge long-term relationships with them to help achieve successful outcomes and solve their legal issues through practical business advice and cutting-edge legal insight. Our clients view us as trusted business advisors because we understand that great legal service is only valuable if it is relevant, practical and beneficial to their businesses.
The Guidance takes effect Monday, January 7, 2019.
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On January 4, 2019, the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announced revised guidance for determining subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101 for computer-implemented inventions (Guidance). The Guidance takes effect Monday, January 7, 2019. The Guidance is important for medical patents that use algorithms for diagnosis and treatment decisions in personalized medicine.

Two Primary Changes to Improve Clarity

Two primary changes on how patent examiners should apply the first part of the two part U.S. Supreme Court's Alice/Mayo test, are made to improve "clarity, consistency, and predictability of actions across the USPTO" (quoting Under Secretary of Commerce of Intellectual Property and Director of the USPTO Andrei Iancu Guidance Press Release):

  1. The revised Guidance "extracts and synthesizes key concepts identified by the courts as abstract ideas to explain that the abstract idea exception includes certain groupings of subject matter: mathematical concepts, certain methods of organizing human activity, and mental processes";
  2. The revised Guidance "includes a two-prong inquiry for whether a claim is 'directed to' a judicial exception. In the first prong, examiners will evaluate whether the claim recites a judicial exception and if so, proceed to the second prong. In the second prong, examiners evaluate whether the claim recites additional elements that integrate the identified judicial exception into a practical application."

Guidance Press Release

Public Comments Requested

The USPTO is seeking public comment on the Guidance documents. The public is invited to submit comments and suggestions for future guidance documents to Eligibility2019@USPTO.gov on or before March 8, 2019.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More