ARTICLE
20 December 2018

Click-To-Call Cert Petition – Second Extension Of Time Granted

JD
Jones Day

Contributor

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,500 lawyers across five continents. The Firm is distinguished by a singular tradition of client service; the mutual commitment to, and the seamless collaboration of, a true partnership; formidable legal talent across multiple disciplines and jurisdictions; and shared professional values that focus on client needs.
As reported in a prior post, DexMedia, Inc. previously filed an Application for Extension of Time to File a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari requesting an extension of 30 days in which to file a cert petition...
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

As reported in a prior post, DexMedia, Inc. previously filed an Application for Extension of Time to File a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari  requesting an extension of 30 days in which to file a cert petition challenging the Federal Circuit's divided 10-2 en banc decision, which had found that a voluntary dismissal without prejudice of a district court litigation does not reset the one-year time bar under 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) for filing an IPR petition on the asserted patent.  The Supreme Court previously granted  DexMedia's Application, setting a due date of December 14, 2018 for DexMedia's cert petition.  However, DexMedia recently filed a Second Application for Extension of Time to File a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari, citing complexity of the legal issues and time-sensitive filings in other cases, and the Supreme Court granted  the extension on November 20, 2018.  So DexMedia's cert petition will now be due on January 11, 2019, instead of December 14, 2018. 

35 U.S.C. § 315(b) provides that IPR "may not be instituted if the petition requesting the proceeding is filed more than one year after the date on which the petitioner, real party in interest, or privy of the petitioner is served with a complaint alleging infringement of the patent."  The PTAB had previously ruled  that a voluntary dismissal without prejudice left the parties as though the action had never been brought, such that the associated previously served complaint did not trigger the clock for the one-year time bar.  See Click-To-CallTech. v. Ingenio, Inc., 2015-1242 (Fed. Cir.Aug. 16, 2018) (en banc) for the underlying Federal Circuit decision.

Look to the beginning of 2019 to see how others will weigh in on DexMedia's cert petition. In the meantime, petitioners and patent owners may want to consider how the anticipated cert petition might impact the stance of their matters, should the cert petition be granted.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More