IP Soundings: Inter-Partes Review Strategies (Video Content)

Legislative history states that the IPR process "will allow invalid patents that were mistakenly issued by the USPTO to be fixed in their life."
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Inter-Partes Review (IPR) was designed to be a cost-effective alternative to litigation. Legislative history states that the IPR process "will allow invalid patents that were mistakenly issued by the USPTO to be fixed in their life, before they disrupt an entire industry or result in expensive litigation." 157 Cong. Rec. S1326 (daily ed. Mar. 7, 2011) (statement of Sen. Sessions). With an expedited schedule, individuals can expect a final written decision within 12-18 months.

In the first part of a two part episode, partner  David C. Gryce speaks with partners  Imran Khaliq and  Pamela Fulmer on details of Inter-Partes Review including discussions on filing requirements, standards for granting IPRs, types of discovery, amending claims, and more. To watch the video, click the link below.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More