ARTICLE
9 September 2024

PTAB Institutes Sarepta's IPR

GP
Goodwin Procter LLP

Contributor

At Goodwin, we partner with our clients to practice law with integrity, ingenuity, agility, and ambition. Our 1,600 lawyers across the United States, Europe, and Asia excel at complex transactions, high-stakes litigation and world-class advisory services in the technology, life sciences, real estate, private equity, and financial industries. Our unique combination of deep experience serving both the innovators and investors in a rapidly changing, technology-driven economy sets us apart.
As we previously reported, REGENXBIO's litigation against Sarepta, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 11,680,274 (the "'274 patent") by Sarepta's gene therapy product, was stayed pending resolution of Sarepta's IPR...
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

As we previously reported, REGENXBIO's litigation against Sarepta, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 11,680,274 (the "'274 patent") by Sarepta's gene therapy product, was stayed pending resolution of Sarepta's IPR against the '274 patent.

The PTAB now has granted institution of Sarepta's IPR, which challenges claims 1, 3-6, and 8 of the '274 patent as obvious over four prior art references: US 2003/0138772 A1 ("'772 Publication"), Qing Xie et al., The atomic structure of adeno-associated virus (AAV-2), a vector for human gene therapy, 99 Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci., 10405–10410 (2002) ("Xie"), Stephen Snowdy, Nuclear targeting by adeno-associated virus capsid proteins and virions (2003) (Ph.D. dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill) ("Snowdy"), and/or Stewart A. Fabb et al., Adeno-associated virus vector gene transfer and sarcolemmal expression of a 144 kDa micro-dystrophin effectively restores the dystrophin-associated protein complex and inhibits myofiber degeneration in nude/mdx mice, 11 Human Molecular Genetics 733–741 (2002) ("Fabb").

Patent Owner's response is due November 14, 2024, with Petitioner's reply due February 6, 2025, and Patent Owner's sur-reply due March 20, 2025.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More