ARTICLE
16 February 2024

IPR v. Ex Parte Reexam Strategy Considerations

AV
Axinn Veltrop & Harkrider

Contributor

Axinn combines the skills, experience and dedication of the world’s largest firms with the focus, responsiveness, efficiency and attention to client needs of the best boutiques. The firm was established with a common vision: provide the highest level of service and strategic acumen in antitrust, intellectual property and high-stakes litigation.
Looking forward to presenting at the AIPLA IP Practice in Japan Mid-Winter Program in Houston, TX next week!
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

I will be discussing the strategic considerations for Inter Partes Review (IPR) versus Ex Parte Reexamination, including:

  • The procedural differences between IPR and Ex Parte Reexamination and associated statistics
  • The circumstances when one may be preferable over the other
  • The effects of timing and estoppel in parallel litigations

My colleague, Jason Murata, another partner in Axinn's Intellectual Property group, will be covering, "Recent Developments in the Generic Pharma Industry in the U.S."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More