Attorney's Fees In Copyright Cases

MF
Morrison & Foerster LLP

Contributor

Known for providing cutting-edge legal advice on matters that are redefining industries, Morrison & Foerster has 17 offices located in the United States, Asia, and Europe. Our clients include Fortune 100 companies, leading tech and life sciences companies, and some of the largest financial institutions. We also represent investment funds and startups.
Michael Jacobs and Karl Johnston authored an article for Bloomberg Law discussing attorney's fees and how intellectual property litigators can achieve the best and most cost-effective results...
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Michael Jacobs and Karl Johnston authored an article for Bloomberg Law discussing attorney's fees and how intellectual property litigators can achieve the best and most cost-effective results for their clients, especially as many cases now involve both patent and copyright claims.

“Section 505 [of the Copyright Act of 1976] provides a favorable standard for the award of attorney's fees, especially compared to the Patent and Lanham Acts,” the authors wrote. “Given this standard, litigators should research and consider seeking fees even in cases that may not be sufficiently ‘exceptional' compared with other intellectual property cases.”

Read the full article (subscription required).

Originally Published by Bloomberg Law

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More