ARTICLE
6 August 2021

PTAB's Sua Sponte Claim Construction Without An Adequate Notice Is Improper

FH
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP

Contributor

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP is a law firm dedicated to advancing ideas, discoveries, and innovations that drive businesses around the world. From offices in the United States, Europe, and Asia, Finnegan works with leading innovators to protect, advocate, and leverage their most important intellectual property (IP) assets.
In Qualcomm v. Intel, No. 2020-1589 (Fed. Cir. July 27, 2021), the Federal Circuit vacated the PTAB's Final Written Decision and remanded for further proceedings.
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In Qualcomm v. Intel, No. 2020-1589 (Fed. Cir. July 27, 2021), the Federal Circuit vacated the PTAB's Final Written Decision and remanded for further proceedings. The Federal Circuit held that the PTAB violated Qualcomm's procedural rights under the APA because it failed to provide Qualcomm an adequate notice of, and an opportunity to respond to, its sua sponte  claim construction removing a claim requirement that was agreed-upon by the parties. Finnegan's At the PTAB Blog explains the details of the decision.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More