Round 2 For The Title Insurance Industry, But The Fight Is Far From Over

MF
Morrison & Foerster LLP

Contributor

Known for providing cutting-edge legal advice on matters that are redefining industries, Morrison & Foerster has 17 offices located in the United States, Asia, and Europe. Our clients include Fortune 100 companies, leading tech and life sciences companies, and some of the largest financial institutions. We also represent investment funds and startups.
In February of this year, strict new regulations, promulgated by the New York Department of Financial Services (DFS), went into effect, banning title companies ...
United States Insurance
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In February of this year, strict new regulations, promulgated by the New York Department of Financial Services (DFS), went into effect, banning title companies from engaging in a wide range of marketing activities that could be considered inducements for business. The regulations were extremely broad, and were quickly challenged in court by the New York State Land Title Association and several title agencies. 

On July 5, Judge Eileen A. Rakower of the New York State Supreme Court annulled the DFS regulations. The court found that the regulations issued by DFS had exceeded the intent of the statute; the intent of the underlying statute was to prohibit kickbacks and other inducements, not "to prohibit ordinary marketing and entertainment expenses." Judge Rakower called it an "absurd proposition" to suggest that the legislature intended to "prohibit title insurance corporations from marketing themselves for business."

The title insurance industry is seemingly split over how to react to the ruling, as DFS Superintendent Maria Vullo has already filed a notice of appeal with the court. Some in the industry expect to remain cautious in light of the pending appeal, especially if the appellate court stays the lower court's decision. But even without a stay, no one wants to be the example that supports the DFS's case at the appellate level. Others, however, feel vindicated and foresee a return to business as usual in marketing and entertainment activities. We have informally polled various contacts in the title industry regarding how they plan to respond to this development, and many said they will "wait and see" what happens during the appeal process.

This ruling seems to be good news for many in the title industry who wish to see a return to the wining and dining and lavish parties of the recent past, but this is only the beginning of a continuing battle. The next step is up to Maria Vullo and the DFS. This seems far from over.

Morrison & Foerster's New York Real Estate Group will continue to monitor the situation and advise accordingly. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to reach out to any of our team members.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More