Business Enterprise Exclusion Bars Coverage For Claim Arising Out Of Conduct Related To Joint Venture

WR
Wiley Rein

Contributor

Wiley is a preeminent law firm wired into Washington. We advise Fortune 500 corporations, trade associations, and individuals in all industries on legal matters converging at the intersection of government, business, and technological innovation. Our attorneys and public policy advisors are respected and have nuanced insights into the mindsets of agencies, regulators, and lawmakers. We are the best-kept secret in DC for many of the most innovative and transformational companies, business groups, and nonprofit organizations. From autonomous vehicles to blockchain technologies, we combine our focused industry knowledge and unmatched understanding of Washington to anticipate challenges, craft policies, and formulate solutions for emerging innovators and industries.
The United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, applying Florida law, has held that a Business Enterprise exclusion in a professional liability policy barred coverage...
United States Insurance
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, applying Florida law, has held that a Business Enterprise exclusion in a professional liability policy barred coverage for claims brought against a law firm and its attorneys for their alleged breaches of a joint venture agreement. Security Nat'l Ins. Co. v. Hendrik Uiterwyk, P.A., 2024 WL 1284877 (M.D. Fla. Mar. 26, 2024).

In 2002, the insured law firm entered into a joint venture agreement (JVA) with another firm. The JVA memorialized a case referral arrangement and stated that the venture would convert to a partnership at some point in the future. In 2021, the insured was sued for its alleged failure to comply with its obligations under the JVA. The insured notified its professional liability insurer of the suit, and the insurer brought an action seeking a declaratory judgment that it owed no duty to defend or indemnify the insured in connection with the underlying claims.

The coverage action turned on the applicability of the policy's Business Enterprise exclusion. That exclusion precluded coverage for any Claim "based upon or arising out of any actual or alleged activities of an Insured as . . . an officer, director, partner, trustee or employee of a . . . business enterprise, other than the Named Insured." First, the court found that the JVA—through which the insured agreed to form a new entity to provide legal services and refer cases—created a "business enterprise" distinct from the Named Insured. Second, it determined that the underlying claims "plainly base all their allegations on the [insured's] failure to comply with the JVA, in their capacity as members or partners of the business enterprise formed by the agreement." Accordingly, the court concluded that the allegations were "cast solely and entirely within the [] exclusion and [were] subject to no other reasonable interpretation." In holding that the Business Enterprise exclusion barred coverage, the court observed that the exclusion's prefatory language "arising out of" was "unambiguous and sweeping."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More