Contributors Speak Up: Let's Examine Examiners

W
WilmerHale

Contributor

WilmerHale provides legal representation across a comprehensive range of practice areas critical to the success of its clients. With a staunch commitment to public service, the firm is a leader in pro bono representation. WilmerHale is 1,000 lawyers strong with 12 offices in the United States, Europe and Asia.
In a feature published by the Creditor Rights Coalition, Partner Philip Anker discusses what he perceives as the two key questions in the FTX bankruptcy case in advance of the March 20 hearing...
United States Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In a feature published by the Creditor Rights Coalition, Partner Philip Anker discusses what he perceives as the two key questions in the FTX bankruptcy case in advance of the March 20 hearing: what the law is, and what it should be?

Excerpt: "Especially in a case like FTX where no creditor or other party in interest with an economic stake in the outcome of the case requests the appointment of an examiner, and where the judge presiding over the case sees no need for an examiner, I am hard pressed to see why one should be required."

Read the full article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More