ARTICLE
2 September 2020

Emissions And Health Risks From The Use Of 3D Printers In An Occupational Setting

CC
Clyde & Co

Contributor

Clyde & Co  logo
Clyde & Co is a leading, sector-focused global law firm with 415 partners, 2200 legal professionals and 3800 staff in over 50 offices and associated offices on six continents. The firm specialises in the sectors that move, build and power our connected world and the insurance that underpins it, namely: transport, infrastructure, energy, trade & commodities and insurance. With a strong focus on developed and emerging markets, the firm is one of the fastest growing law firms in the world with ambitious plans for further growth.
The samples also included size-resolved levels of nano-diameter from the printing room.
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In order to assess the health risks and potential exposures of using a 3D printer in an occupational setting, a recent case study focused on determining the concentrations of particulates and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted from 3D printers using polylactic acid (PLA) filaments. With one printer being the typical usage, and three printers operating as the worst case, the amount of particulate concentration (total and respirable), VOCs and formaldehyde were measured. The collection of air samples were done in the printing room and adjacent hallway. The samples also included size-resolved levels of nano-diameter from the printing room.

The findings revealed total particulate levels were higher in the worst-case scenario (0.7 mg/m3) vs. typical-case scenario (0.3 mg/m3), while respirable particulate and formaldehyde concentrations were similar between the two situations. Total VOC levels were approximately 6-fold higher during the worst-case scenario vs. typical situation with isopropyl alcohol being the predominant VOC. Airborne concentrations in the hallway were generally found to be lower than inside the printing room. All measurements were below their respective occupational exposure limits.

The conclusion of the case study found that when multiple 3D printers were in use emissions of particulates and VOCs increased. Airborne levels in the adjacent hallway were found to be similar between the two scenarios. In summary, the data as a whole suggests there is low risk of significant and persistent adverse health effects from the use of 3D printers. However, the use of 3D printing and resulting health effects have not been fully confirmed, and observing good hygiene principles is suggested when using 3D printers. 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More