Issue 109: House Passes Modified Version Of AHCA - Bill To Proceed To Senate

SS
Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Contributor

With more than 900 lawyers across 18 offices, Seyfarth Shaw LLP provides advisory, litigation, and transactional legal services to clients worldwide. Our high-caliber legal representation and advanced delivery capabilities allow us to take on our clients’ unique challenges and opportunities-no matter the scale or complexity. Whether navigating complex litigation, negotiating transformational deals, or advising on cross-border projects, our attorneys achieve exceptional legal outcomes. Our drive for excellence leads us to seek out better ways to work with our clients and each other. We have been first-to-market on many legal service delivery innovations-and we continue to break new ground with our clients every day. This long history of excellence and innovation has created a culture with a sense of purpose and belonging for all. In turn, our culture drives our commitment to the growth of our clients, the diversity of our people, and the resilience of our workforce.
This is the one hundred and ninth issue in our series of alerts for employers on selected topics on health care reform.
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

This is the one hundred and ninth issue in our series of alerts for employers on selected topics on health care reform.   (Click here to access our general Summary of Health Care Reform and other issues in this series.)   This series of Health Care Reform Management Alerts is designed to provide an in-depth analysis of certain aspects of health care reform and how it will impact your employer-sponsored plans.

Seyfarth Synopsis: On May 4th, House Republicans were finally able to pass a modified version of the American Health Care Act ("AHCA") on the thinnest of margins.   To muster the votes, the Republicans had to make a series of tweaks to the bill that were requested by both the conservative Freedom Caucus as well as the more moderate Tuesday Group. Most notably, the AHCA (as modified) would permit states to opt-out of the Affordable Care Act's (ACA's) community rating and essential health benefits (EHB) requirements. To minimize the potential impact on persons with pre-existing condition exclusions (who would likely pay more in the absence of these standards), the AHCA allocates billions of dollars that states may use to establish high risk pools. The bill now proceeds to the Senate where it faces additional challenges in what is typically a more independent, deliberative legislative body.
 

After a false start in late March, on May 4th House Republicans were finally able to pass a modified version of the American Health Care Act ("AHCA") on the thinnest of margins.  To muster the votes, the Republicans had to make a series of tweaks to the bill that were requested by both the conservative Freedom Caucus as well as the more moderate Tuesday Group.  See, Issue 106 for details on the originally proposed AHCA.

What Changed from the Earlier Bill?

Most notably, the AHCA (as modified) would permit states to opt-out of the Affordable Care Act's (ACA's) community rating and essential health benefits (EHB) requirements, as discussed in Issue 108.  The ACA requires all plans in the individual and small group markets to cover all EHBs and generally prohibits carriers from charging sick people more for coverage.  To minimize the potential impact on persons with pre-existing condition exclusions (who would likely pay more in the absence of these standards), the AHCA allocates billions of dollars that states may use to establish high risk pools.

The amendment originally exempted Congress (whose members must get coverage from the Marketplace) from these changes to the ACA.  After a public outcry, the House first voted to remove the Congressional exemption, then voted to pass the AHCA.

House Republicans could only afford to lose 21 Republican votes.  They lost 20 (and picked up no Democratic support), so the bill passed with a razor-thin 217-213 margin.

What Happens Next? 

While it may seem surprising given the efforts required to get to this point, the House vote was always viewed as the easier step in the process.  The Senate will now take up the AHCA, and significant hurdles remain.  Notably:

  • CBO Score.  Immediately following the House vote, Mitch McConnell announced the Senate would wait for the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) score before voting.  Prior to the amendments watering down the pre-existing condition exclusion protections and adding billions of dollars in high-risk pool spending, the CBO score suggested the AHCA would save roughly $300 billion but result in 24 million fewer covered persons over ten years, as compared to the ACA. Most expect the figures in the revised report will be worse.  
  • Eligibility for Consideration through Reconciliation.  It's unclear whether some of the changes the AHCA makes to the ACA will qualify for inclusion in a Senate reconciliation bill (which generally can only include revenue-related provisions).  If the Senate's parliamentarian disagrees that this bill contains exclusively revenue-related provisions, the Senate would need to either modify the bill (which would then need to go back to the House), or pick up 60 votes (requiring Democratic support, which is unlikely).  
  • Changes Expected.  Putting aside the reconciliation-related concerns, several Republican Senators and President Trump himself have suggested the bill will change in the Senate.  Many of these amendments would offset the delicate balance the House is trying to strike to win the necessary votes, meaning the two bodies may not be able to pass the same version of the bill (which would be required).  
  • President's Promises.  President Trump has promised the AHCA will protect persons with pre-existing conditions.  Kaiser Family Foundation is projecting that the billions of dollars allocated to cover people with pre-existing conditions in a separate, high-risk insurance pool will only cover a fraction of the costs.  In the past, these high-risk pools have been unsuccessful due to inadequate funding.  

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More