Update On The Provider Self-Disclosure Protocol

SM
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

Contributor

Sheppard Mullin is a full service Global 100 firm with over 1,000 attorneys in 16 offices located in the United States, Europe and Asia. Since 1927, companies have turned to Sheppard Mullin to handle corporate and technology matters, high stakes litigation and complex financial transactions. In the US, the firm’s clients include more than half of the Fortune 100.
Since we last reported on the Provider Self-Disclosure Protocol issued by the HHS Office of the Inspector General, the entire Protocol has been revamped.
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Since we last reported on the Provider Self-Disclosure Protocol ("Protocol") issued by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General ("OIG"), the entire Protocol has been revamped.  Rather than being in the Federal Register, the Protocol is on the OIG website.  The current Protocol extends not just to providers, but also device manufacturers and pharmaceutical companies.

Because the OIG wanted to accelerate the process, the submitting party must complete corrective action before submitting the disclosure and must finish the investigation within 90 days of submission, rather than the previous 90 days from acceptance into the program.

The format for the disclosure is electronic and on the OIG website.  All of the required fields are included in the electronic format.

For billing issues, the calculation of damages changed.  Sampling can still be used, but the sample must be 100 (up from 30).  Total damages = Mean Point Estimate.  If a provider is not familiar with this concept, a statistics consultant can be retained.  No "probe" samples are allowed.  Underpayments cannot be offset against overpayments.

For excluded persons issues, a damages calculation was formally adopted and published to address persons whose services are not billed/separately reimbursed, e.g., salaried personnel.

The minimum amount of a settlement is $50,000 for Anti-Kickback Act submissions; $10,000 for all others.  Stark Law only violations should still be disclosed to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, as opposed to the OIG.

As previously reported, in our experience, the very best multiplier available in an OIG settlement was 1.5 times damages.  The Protocol now formally specifies that the minimum amount of the multiplier is 1.5 times damages. 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More