Tribes: Act Now To Take Advantage Of Supreme Court's Decision On Contract Support Costs

HK
Holland & Knight

Contributor

Holland & Knight is a global law firm with nearly 2,000 lawyers in offices throughout the world. Our attorneys provide representation in litigation, business, real estate, healthcare and governmental law. Interdisciplinary practice groups and industry-based teams provide clients with access to attorneys throughout the firm, regardless of location.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on June 6, 2024, that the Indian Health Service (IHS) must pay contract support costs with respect to program income...
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on June 6, 2024, that the Indian Health Service (IHS) must pay contract support costs with respect to program income – payments from Medicare, Medicaid and private insurers – received by tribes that administer healthcare programs under a self-determination contract. Becerra v. San Carlos Apache Tribe, --- S.Ct. ---- 2024 WL 2853107 (June 6, 2024). For the past 30 years, tribes have sought such compensation, and IHS has refused to provide it. The Court's ruling is a notable victory for Indian Country.

All tribes who have a 638 contract (or a compact) with IHS to provide health services should move promptly to take advantage of this decision and secure the additional funds to which they are entitled. A number of tribes have been following this issue and have already preserved their claims regarding past years. But even tribes that have not previously done so can gain the benefit of this decision.

There is a six-year statute of limitations on claims for additional compensation under a self-determination agreement. IHS faces a large amount of financial liability as a result of this decision, and it will vigorously enforce this limitations period. Thus, it is essential that any tribe that has not already filed a claim for these contract support costs proceed to do so now, without delay.

Please note: The authors wrote an amicus brief on behalf of the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI), Choctaw Nation and other tribes and tribal organizations in the case in favor of the tribal position.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More