Texas Hospital's Vaccine Mandate For Workers Is Upheld By Federal Judge

SG
Shipman & Goodwin LLP

Contributor

Shipman & Goodwin’s value lies in our commitment -- to our clients, to the profession and to the community. We have one goal: to help our clients achieve their goals. How we accomplish it is simple: we devote our considerable experience and depth of knowledge to understand each client’s unique needs, business and industry, and then we develop solutions to meet those needs. Clients turn to us when they need a trusted advisor. With our invaluable awareness of each client’s challenges, we can counsel them at every step -- to keep their operations running smoothly, help them navigate complex business transactions, position them for future growth, or resolve business disputes. The success of our clients is of primary importance to us and our attorneys invest meaningful time getting to know the client's business and are skilled in the practice areas and industry sectors critical to that success. With more than 175 attorneys in offices throughout Connecticut, New York and in Washington, DC, we serve the needs of
This was a case of first impression and is relevant as more and more hospitals are mandating that their staff must be vaccinated.
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On June 12, 2021, U.S. District Judge Lynn N. Hughes dismissed a lawsuit filed by Jennifer Bridges and 116 other employees (the "Plaintiffs") of Houston Methodist Hospital (the "Hospital"), who argued that the Hospital's COVID-19 vaccination mandate for workers is illegal. This was a case of first impression and is relevant as more and more hospitals are mandating that their staff must be vaccinated.

On April 1, 2021, the Hospital announced a policy requiring that all employees receive the COVID-19 vaccine by June 7, 2021. Shortly thereafter, the Plaintiffs sued the Hospital to block the vaccine requirement and any terminations that could occur as a result of the new policy.

Judge Hughes rejected the Plaintiffs' arguments that the Hospital's termination of employees who refuse to be vaccinated would constitute wrongful termination, stating that Texas law only protects employees from being terminated for refusing to commit illegal acts and that "[r]eceiving a COVID-19 vaccination is not an illegal act, and it carries no criminal penalties." In addition, Judge Hughes rejected the Plaintiffs' arguments that the Hospital's policy violates federal law, including law governing the protection of "human subjects" and the Nuremberg Code. Judge Hughes dismissed these arguments, explaining that "[t]he [H]ospital's employees are not participants in a human trial. They are licensed doctors, nurses, medical technicians, and staff members. The [H]ospital has not applied to test the COVID-19 vaccines on its employees, it has not been approved by an institutional review board, and it has not been certified to proceed with clinical trials." Judge Hughes further explained that the Nuremberg Code does not apply in this case because the Hospital "is a private employer, not a government" and noted that the Plaintiffs' act of "[e]quating the injection requirement to medical experimentation in concentration camps is reprehensible." Lastly, Judge Hughes rejected the Plaintiffs' argument that they are being coerced "to be injected with a vaccine or be fired," stating that "Bridges can freely choose to accept or refuse a COVID-19 vaccine; however, if she refuses, she will simply need to work somewhere else."

If you have any questions regarding the development and implementation of COVID-19 vaccine policies, please do not hesitate to contact any member of the Health Law Practice Group at Shipman & Goodwin LLP.

A copy of the decision of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas may be found here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More