ARTICLE
16 November 2013

Third Circuit Denies Rehearing In Sports Betting Case

DM
Duane Morris LLP

Contributor

Duane Morris LLP, a law firm with more than 800 attorneys in offices across the United States and internationally, is asked by a broad array of clients to provide innovative solutions to today's legal and business challenges.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has denied New Jersey's petition to have the entire court rehear the case that upheld the constitutionality of PASPA and enjoined New Jersey from implementing sports betting.
United States Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has denied New Jersey's petition to have the entire court rehear the case that upheld the constitutionality of PASPA and enjoined New Jersey from implementing sports betting.

Circuit courts decide appeals in panels, generally of three judges.  Under the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, a party that loses an appeal has the right to ask that the case be heard again by all of the judges assigned to the court.  Appellate courts do not often grant this relief, however, it was an avenue for New Jersey to continue its appeal without having to seek relief from the United States Supreme Court.  Now that the petition has been denied, New Jersey's only other avenue of appeal is to the United States Supreme Court.

The full text of the order is as follows:

The petition for rehearing filed by the Governor of the State of New Jersey, David L. Rebuck, Frank Zanzuccki, New Jersey Thoroughbred Horsemen's Association, Inc., and Sheila Y. Oliver and Stephen M. Sweeney, appellants in the above-entitled cases having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the judges of the circuit in regular service not having voted for rehearing, the petitions for rehearing by the panel and the Court en banc, is denied.

This article is for general information and does not include full legal analysis of the matters presented. It should not be construed or relied upon as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. The description of the results of any specific case or transaction contained herein does not mean or suggest that similar results can or could be obtained in any other matter. Each legal matter should be considered to be unique and subject to varying results. The invitation to contact the authors or attorneys in our firm is not a solicitation to provide professional services and should not be construed as a statement as to any availability to perform legal services in any jurisdiction in which such attorney is not permitted to practice.

Duane Morris LLP, a full-service law firm with more than 700 attorneys in 24 offices in the United States and internationally, offers innovative solutions to the legal and business challenges presented by today's evolving global markets. Duane Morris LLP, a full-service law firm with more than 700 attorneys in 24 offices in the United States and internationally, offers innovative solutions to the legal and business challenges presented by today's evolving global markets. The Duane Morris Institute provides training workshops for HR professionals, in-house counsel, benefits administrators and senior managers.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More