ARTICLE
20 August 2020

Potential Changes To Distributor Agreements For Small Breweries

BD
Bowditch & Dewey

Contributor

Bowditch & Dewey logo
Bowditch is a highly-regarded law firm handling sophisticated transactions, challenging litigation and complex regulatory issues for businesses, families and institutions throughout Massachusetts, the region and beyond. With more than 60 lawyers, Bowditch is a preeminent law firm, delivering outstanding client satisfaction and big-firm quality legal services.
The Massachusetts Senate recently passed a bill that would bring an end to a hard-fought dispute between the craft brewery industry and distributors.
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The Massachusetts Senate recently passed a bill that would bring an end to a hard-fought dispute between the craft brewery industry and distributors. The pending legislation represents a significant compromise between the two industry groups, making it easier for most craft breweries to end their relationships with wholesalers. Although the bill is not yet law, both sides are optimistic that, after overcoming a number of challenges along the way, this mutually beneficial agreement will finally close the book on a nearly decade-long negotiation.

Within just the past few years, there have been a number of failed attempts to reform G. L. c. 138, § 25E, which controls how and when a brewery can choose a new distributor. As it is currently written, if a brewery has regularly engaged with a wholesaler during a 6-month period, it cannot thereafter refuse to sell to that wholesaler unless the brewery demonstrates "good cause." This has proven to be a difficult hurdle, meaning that breweries are often left with no choice but to continue working with the same distributor.

Senate Bill 2841 would create an exception to this rule. The change would permit small breweries to terminate distributorship agreements without good cause, upon 30 days' notice, provided that the wholesaler is compensated for its unsold inventory, its marketing investment, and the loss of distribution rights. Any disputes regarding fair compensation under the new law would be submitted to arbitration.

Although only breweries that produce less than 250,000 barrels per year could exercise this option, almost every brewery in the Commonwealth falls would qualify. The notable exception is Boston Beer Company, which reportedly agreed to be excluded so that a compromise could be reached.

The saga is not over just yet, as the House of Representatives must next vote on S. 2841 before passing it on to the Governor for his approval. But the sense of relief from both industry groups (distributors and breweries) is palpable, as those who have tirelessly worked for years to find this common ground are clearly confident about the path forward.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More