ARTICLE
21 March 2016

FDA Settlement With Amarin Permits Off-Label Drug Promotion

DP
Day Pitney LLP

Contributor

Day Pitney LLP logo
Day Pitney LLP is a full-service law firm with more than 300 attorneys in Boston, Connecticut, Florida, New Jersey, New York and Washington, DC. The firm offers clients strong corporate and litigation practices, with experience on behalf of large national and international corporations as well as emerging and middle-market companies. With one of the largest individual clients practices on the East Coast, the firm also has extensive experience assisting individuals and their families, fiduciaries and tax-exempt entities plan for the future.
On March 8, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and Amarin Pharma, Inc. entered into a settlement agreement resolving litigation brought by Amarin against the FDA related to Amarin's off-label promotion of Vascepa®...
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On March 8, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Amarin Pharma, Inc. entered into a settlement agreement resolving litigation brought by Amarin against the FDA related to Amarin's off-label promotion of Vascepa®, a drug used to lower fat levels. In August 2015 the federal district court in Manhattan ruled that the FDA could not prohibit Amarin from using truthful information to promote the drug, whether or not for an off-label use, because such a prohibition would violate Amarin's right to free speech.

Under the terms of the settlement the FDA agreed to be bound by the court's ruling to permit Amarin to market Vascepa® for the off-label use at issue (to treat patients with persistently high triglycerides), provided that Amarin assures that its promotion of such off-label use remains truthful and non-misleading. The settlement agreement also permits Amarin to submit a limited number of communications annually relating to additional proposed off-label uses of the drug to the FDA for preclearance through an expedited process through 2020.

Proponents of the court's ruling and the settlement argue that drug companies should have the right to inform doctors about the benefits of off-label uses of their drugs to support informed medical decisions for the benefit of patients. Critics argue that off-label drug promotion represents an end run around established FDA authority that prohibits drug companies from marketing drugs for uses the FDA has not approved. Whether the court ruling and settlement will significantly expand off-label marketing efforts by drug companies remains to be seen.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More