ARTICLE
1 November 2023

FDA's New Enforcement Policy: A Win For Remote Patient Monitoring And Remote Therapeutic Monitoring Manufacturers

FL
Foley & Lardner
Contributor
Foley & Lardner LLP looks beyond the law to focus on the constantly evolving demands facing our clients and their industries. With over 1,100 lawyers in 24 offices across the United States, Mexico, Europe and Asia, Foley approaches client service by first understanding our clients’ priorities, objectives and challenges. We work hard to understand our clients’ issues and forge long-term relationships with them to help achieve successful outcomes and solve their legal issues through practical business advice and cutting-edge legal insight. Our clients view us as trusted business advisors because we understand that great legal service is only valuable if it is relevant, practical and beneficial to their businesses.
On October 19, 2023, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff titled Enforcement Policy for Non-Invasive Remote Monitoring Devices Used to Support Patient Monitoring (guidance).
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On October 19, 2023, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff titled Enforcement Policy for Non-Invasive Remote Monitoring Devices Used to Support Patient Monitoring (guidance). This guidance updates previous guidance issued during the COVID-19 pandemic and is meant to provide clarity on current enforcement policies now that the public health emergency is declared over.

Limited Modifications to Indications or Functionality. In its guidance, FDA announced that the administration does not intend to object to limited modifications to the indications or functionality of certain non-invasive remote monitoring devices that are used to support patient monitoring that allow for increased remote monitoring capability without prior submission of a 510(k) where the modification does not create undue risk and does not directly affect the physiological parameter measurement algorithm even if such modifications would have required a 510(k) submission previously.

Included Devices. The guidance includes a table of included devices that measure or detect common physiological parameters, e.g., monitoring spirometer, apnea monitor, or electrocardiograph. As an example, FDA noted that a modification to the indications to allow for in-home use as opposed to hospital settings does not create such undue risk and does not affect the physiological parameter measurement algorithm.

Limited Hardware or Software Architecture Modifications. Additionally, FDA does not intend to object to limited hardware or software architecture modifications to certain non-invasive remote monitoring devices, e.g., device connectivity modifications (wireless and/or Bluetooth) that are used to support patient monitoring that allow for increased remote monitoring capability without prior submission of a 510(k) when the modification does not create undue risk and where the modifications do not directly affect the physiological parameter measurement algorithm.

The guidance provides that manufacturers of the non-invasive remote monitoring devices listed in Table 1 of the guidance are still required to submit a premarket notification under section 510(k) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to FDA and receive FDA clearance prior to marketing these devices in the United States, to the extent the devices are not 510(k) exempt, as well as comply with post-marketing requirements. The guidance only applies to certain modifications made to these already legally marketed devices.

Caveats. Modifications to the indications or functionality that could create undue risk or that could affect the physiological parameter measurement algorithm would not be within the scope of the policy articulated in the guidance and would generally require submission of a 510(k). Modifications to add new indications or device software functions to allow for remote programming of the device, remote control of the device, generation of new alarms, measurement of new physiological parameters, or a change from prescription to over-the-counter use would not be within the scope of FDA's policy, for example.

Why this Guidance is Important

This risk-based approach is good news for the Remote Patient Monitoring and the Remote Therapeutic Monitoring industry. Manufacturers of certain devices that measure or detect common physiological parameters may now make certain modifications and bring these modifications to market without having to undertake the 510(k) clearance process.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

ARTICLE
1 November 2023

FDA's New Enforcement Policy: A Win For Remote Patient Monitoring And Remote Therapeutic Monitoring Manufacturers

United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Contributor
Foley & Lardner LLP looks beyond the law to focus on the constantly evolving demands facing our clients and their industries. With over 1,100 lawyers in 24 offices across the United States, Mexico, Europe and Asia, Foley approaches client service by first understanding our clients’ priorities, objectives and challenges. We work hard to understand our clients’ issues and forge long-term relationships with them to help achieve successful outcomes and solve their legal issues through practical business advice and cutting-edge legal insight. Our clients view us as trusted business advisors because we understand that great legal service is only valuable if it is relevant, practical and beneficial to their businesses.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More