ARTICLE
29 March 2023

FDA Draft Guidance Signifies Acceptance Of The Term "Milk" To Describe Plant-Based Alternatives

SM
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

Contributor

Sheppard Mullin is a full service Global 100 firm with over 1,000 attorneys in 16 offices located in the United States, Europe and Asia. Since 1927, companies have turned to Sheppard Mullin to handle corporate and technology matters, high stakes litigation and complex financial transactions. In the US, the firm’s clients include more than half of the Fortune 100.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has released draft guidance for the labeling of plant-based milk alternatives, which could have a significant impact on the way these products are marketed and sold.
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has released draft guidance for the labeling of plant-based milk alternatives, which could have a significant impact on the way these products are marketed and sold. The proposed guidance suggests that manufacturers and distributors of increasingly popular oat, almond, cashew, soy and other milk alternatives should be allowed to use the term "milk" to describe their products despite the fact these products have no actual dairy content.

The FDA outlined in the draft guidance that it is considering allowing the use of the term "milk" to describe these popular alternatives because most consumers understand the differences between plant- and animal-produced milk due to the growth in popularity of plant-based milk alternatives. The term "milk" has been colloquially used to refer to the byproduct made when water is combined with a tree nut, legume, seed or grain. The market for non-dairy milk alternatives has continually grown over the past decade, with the use of the term "milk" to describe these products increasingly commonplace.

But, the FDA does note that if plant-based milk alternatives are labeled as "milk" despite containing no dairy, consumers should be made aware of the nutritional differences between the plant-based milk and cow's milk. As such, the FDA recommends that plant-based milk makers include a statement on their label clarifying the differences between their product and cow's milk. One example given by the FDA is the addition of language on the label saying "contains lower amounts of Vitamin D and calcium than milk."

The FDA draft guidance comes five years after the FDA began gathering comments on the issue and after years of lawsuits over the use of the term "milk" to describe non-dairy milk alternatives. The use of the term "milk" to describe these products has drawn complaints from the dairy industry, which argues that the term should only apply to animal milks. The proposed rule is not final, and companies do not have to follow draft guidance, but many food companies follow FDA guidelines closely. The FDA will accept comments on the draft guidance until April 23, 2023.

Although the FDA draft guidance does not put an end to the fight over the use of the term "milk" to describe dairy-free milk alternatives, it does signify increasing acceptance of the term. For businesses impacted by this draft guidance, it is recommended that they consult an experienced food and beverage attorney to decrease the risk of litigation and make sure their product label complies with applicable regulations.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More