ARTICLE
19 February 2020

FRB Vice Chair Randal Quarles Offers Recommendations To Improve Bank Supervision

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
Federal Reserve Board ("FRB") Vice Chair Randal K. Quarles offered recommendations to strengthen bank supervision and communication.
United States Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Federal Reserve Board ("FRB") Vice Chair Randal K. Quarles offered recommendations to strengthen bank supervision and communication.

In a speech at Yale Law School, Mr. Quarles emphasized the importance of FRB bank supervision that (i) makes clear the supervisory expectations on banks, (ii) deters banks' bad behavior, and (iii) promotes clear two-way communication. He advocated that the FRB:

  • align supervisory portfolios by using a "clear and transparent standard" that hold banks posing greater risks to higher standards;
  • make stress tests more transparent;
  • modify the FRB capital rule to allow banks to review their supervisory tests before submitting their capital plans;
  • create a word-searchable database on the FRB website that includes historical interpretations;
  • request public comment on significant supervisory guidance to encourage more informed supervision and increased engagement with banks; and
  • adopt a rule concerning the FRB's use of guidance during the supervisory process that includes (i) requiring the FRB to comply with the Administrative Procedure Act (or APA) with respect to its supervisory duties and (ii) clarifying that "non-compliance" with the guidance will not serve as the basis for enforcement action against a bank.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More