ARTICLE
7 January 2020

Broker-Dealer Agrees To Settle FINRA Charges For OATS Reporting And Supervisory Failures

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
A broker-dealer settled FINRA charges for inaccurately reporting over 1 billion reportable order events ("ROEs") to the Order Audit Trail System ("OATS")
United States Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

A broker-dealer settled FINRA charges for inaccurately reporting over 1 billion reportable order events ("ROEs") to the Order Audit Trail System ("OATS"), violating FINRA Rule 7450 ("Order Transmission Data Requirements") and FINRA Rule 3110 ("Supervision"). FINRA Rule 7540 requires broker-dealers to completely and accurately transmit to OATS information related to each order's: (i) receipt or origination; (ii) transmission; and (iii) modification, cancellation, and execution.

According to the Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent, the broker-dealer either inaccurately, incompletely or improperly formatted 1,067,670,851 ROEs. FINRA alleged that the inaccuracies resulted from various deficiencies, including:

  • failure to understand the application of certain codes;
  • flaws within the logic of its own systems, as well as third-party execution and order management systems; and
  • the misclassification of a client account.

FINRA determined that the broker-dealer failed to implement and maintain a supervisory system to comply with OATS-related FINRA rules.

To settle the charges, the broker-dealer agreed to (i) a censure and (ii) a fine of $90,000 ($65,000 for OATS violations and $25,000 for related supervisory violations).

Commentary

Steven Lofchie

Yet another illustration of the fact that when something goes wrong with technology, the number of violations could get very big, very fast.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More