ARTICLE
28 November 2016

EU Recommendations On The Appropriateness Of The Prudential Regime For Investment Firms

SS
Shearman & Sterling LLP

Contributor

Our success is built on our clients’ success. We have a long and distinguished history of supporting our clients wherever they do business, from major financial centers to emerging and growth markets. We represent many of the world’s leading corporations and major financial institutions, as well as emerging growth companies, governments and state-owned enterprises, often working on ground-breaking, precedent-setting matters. With a deep understanding of our clients' businesses and the industries they operate in, our work is driven by their need for outstanding legal and commercial advice.
On October 20, 2016, the EBA published an Opinion on the criteria for identifying investment firms to which the EU regulatory capital requirements legislation should apply.
European Union Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On October 20, 2016, the EBA published an Opinion on the criteria for identifying investment firms to which the EU regulatory capital requirements legislation should apply. The EBA published a report in December 2015 in response to a Call for Advice from the European Commission on the suitability of certain aspects of the EU prudential regime for investment firms. In that report, the EBA recommended that it was necessary to distinguish between investment firms for which the requirements in the CRD and CRR are appropriate and investment firms for which those requirements are inappropriate. It recommended that a separate prudential regime should be established for these investment firms. The Commission issued a second Call for Advice in June 2016, asking for advice on the criteria to identify the investment firms for which the CRD IV requirements are appropriate and which rules should apply to them.

The EBA's Opinion states that the following criteria should be used to identify investment firms that should be subject to CRD IV: systemic importance, interconnectedness with the financial system, complexity and bank-like activities. The EBA recommends that investment firms that have been identified, according to the current EU regulatory framework contained in the relevant technical standards and EBA Guidelines, as G-SIIs or other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) should be subject to the full requirements of CRD IV. Nine investment firms in the EU are currently classed as being O-SIIs. None has been assessed as being a G-SII. The EBA also recommends in its Opinion that any regulatory change for investment firms should be delayed until the review of the CRR is at a more advanced stage. The EBA's response on the rules that should apply to the O-SII investment firms is scheduled to be provided by June 30, 2017.

The EBA's Opinion is available at:

http://www.eba.europa.eu/documents/10180/1639033/Opinion+of+the+European+Banking+Authority+on+the+First+Part+of+the+Call+for+Advice+on+Investment+Firms+%28EBA-Op-2016-16%29.pdf,  the Commission's Call for Advice is available at:

https://www.eba.europa.eu/documents/10180/1321242/CfA+Investment+firms.pdf/9d8f89ab-720a-4ebf-8db7-6e5ebcddbd07 ; and the EBA's 2015 Report is available at: http://www.eba.europa.eu/documents/10180/983359/EBA-Op-2015-20+Report+on+investment+firms.pdf

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More