ARTICLE
21 September 2016

European Parliament Announces Decision To Reject Delegated Resolution Of RTS On Key Information Documents For PRIIPs

O
Orrick

Contributor

Orrick logo
Orrick is a global law firm focused on serving the technology & innovation, energy & infrastructure and finance sectors. Founded over 150 years ago, Orrick has offices in 25+ markets worldwide. Financial Times selected Orrick as the Most Innovative Law Firm in North America for three years in a row.
The European Parliament rejected the EC's proposed Delegated Regulation supplementing the Regulation on key information documents (KIDs) for packaged retail and insurance based products.
European Union Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On September 14, 2016, the European Parliament announced its decision to reject the European Commission's proposed Delegated Regulation supplementing the Regulation on key information documents (KIDs) for packaged retail and insurance based products (PRIIPs) (Regulation 1286/2014) (PRIIPs KID Regulation). The text of the legislative resolution rejecting the proposed Delegated Regulation sets out a number of reasons why the Parliament decided to reject the Delegated Regulation, including:

  • The need for detailed guidance on the "comprehension alert" without which there is a risk of inconsistent implementation of this component in the KIDs within the single market;
  • The need for clarification surrounding the treatment of multi-option products; and
  • The risk that the rules within the Delegated Regulation are contrary to the purpose of the legislation which is to provide retail investors clear, comparable, non-misleading and understandable information on PRIIPs.

As well as calling on the Commission to submit a new delegated regulation, the European Parliament also calls on the Commission to postpone the application date of the PRIIPs KID Regulation, to ensure that the requirements in the Regulation and Delegated Regulation are implemented smoothly and avoid the application of level 1 without RTS being in force.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More