ARTICLE
6 June 2016

European Banking Authority Decision On Unsolicited Credit Assessments

AO
A&O Shearman

Contributor

A&O Shearman was formed in 2024 via the merger of two historic firms, Allen & Overy and Shearman & Sterling. With nearly 4,000 lawyers globally, we are equally fluent in English law, U.S. law and the laws of the world’s most dynamic markets. This combination creates a new kind of law firm, one built to achieve unparalleled outcomes for our clients on their most complex, multijurisdictional matters – everywhere in the world. A firm that advises at the forefront of the forces changing the current of global business and that is unrivalled in its global strength. Our clients benefit from the collective experience of teams who work with many of the world’s most influential companies and institutions, and have a history of precedent-setting innovations. Together our lawyers advise more than a third of NYSE-listed businesses, a fifth of the NASDAQ and a notable proportion of the London Stock Exchange, the Euronext, Euronext Paris and the Tokyo and Hong Kong Stock Exchanges.
On May 17, 2016, the European Banking Authority published a Decision permitting the use of unsolicited credit assessments of certain External Credit Assessment Institutions...
European Union Finance and Banking

On May 17, 2016, the European Banking Authority published a Decision permitting the use of unsolicited credit assessments of certain External Credit Assessment Institutions for calculating firm capital requirements. The Decision aims to harmonize regulation related to the use of solicited and unsolicited credit assessments across the European Union. Under the Capital Requirements Regulation, unsolicited credit assessments of an ECAI can be used to determine the risk weights to be assigned to assets and off-balance sheet items subject to confirmation from the EBA that the unsolicited assessment does not differ in quality from the solicited assessment of that same ECAI. The EBA is required to refuse or revoke this confirmation if the ECAI has used an unsolicited assessment to put pressure on the rated entity to place an order for credit assessment or other services. The Decision confirms that the quality of the unsolicited credit assessments of the ECAIs set out in the annex to the Decision does not differ from the quality of the solicited credit assessments of those ECAIs.

The EBA published a report providing quantitative and qualitative analysis of both solicited and unsolicited credit assessments of ECAIs. The evidence contained in the report formed the basis of the Decision. The analysis did not identify any difference in the quality of unsolicited and solicited credits ratings for a given ECAI. Also, no evidence in the analysis suggested any use of unsolicited ratings by ECAIs had put pressure on rated entities to place an order for a credit assessment or other services. The Decision will enter into force 20 days from publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

The EBA decision is available at: http://www.eba.europa.eu/documents/10180/1466166/EBA-DC-2016- 151+Decision+on+the+Use+of+Unsolicited+Credit+Assessments.pdf and the EBA Report is available at: http://www.eba.europa.eu/documents/10180/1466166/EBA+Report+on+Unsolicited+Credit+Assessments+%28Article +138+CRR%29.pdf.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More