ARTICLE
13 October 2022

CFPB Requires Bank To Pay Over $190 Million For Overdraft Fees

GP
Goodwin Procter LLP

Contributor

At Goodwin, we partner with our clients to practice law with integrity, ingenuity, agility, and ambition. Our 1,600 lawyers across the United States, Europe, and Asia excel at complex transactions, high-stakes litigation and world-class advisory services in the technology, life sciences, real estate, private equity, and financial industries. Our unique combination of deep experience serving both the innovators and investors in a rapidly changing, technology-driven economy sets us apart.
On September 28, 2022, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) an​nounced that it ordered an Alabama bank to pay over $190 million to resolve allegations...
United States Alabama Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On September 28, 2022, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) announced that it ordered an Alabama bank to pay over $190 million to resolve allegations that it charged its customers surprise overdraft fees between August 2018 and July 2021.

The CFPB alleges that the bank was charging consumers surprise overdraft fees, known as authorized-positive fees, on certain ATM withdrawals and debit card purchases after telling consumers they had sufficient funds at the time of the transactions. According to the CFPB, the fees constituted unfair and deceptive trade practices in violation of the Consumer Financial Protective Act of 2010 (CFPA), 12 U.S.C. §§ 5531(a) and (c)(1), and 5536(a)(1)(B).

The CFPB ordered the bank to pay a $50 million civil money penalty into the CFPB's victims relief fund, and to refund at least $141 million to consumers harmed by its surprise overdraft fees. The order further bans the bank from charging authorized-positive overdraft fees in the future.

The consent order is the second entered into between the CFPB and the Alabama bank concerning overdraft fees. The first, previously covered here, was signed in 2015 and ordered the bank to refund $49 million to consumers and to pay a $7.5 million penalty.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More