Stop Overcharging For Auto Loan Add-on Products

SM
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

Contributor

Sheppard Mullin is a full service Global 100 firm with over 1,000 attorneys in 16 offices located in the United States, Europe and Asia. Since 1927, companies have turned to Sheppard Mullin to handle corporate and technology matters, high stakes litigation and complex financial transactions. In the US, the firm’s clients include more than half of the Fortune 100.
On May 2, the CFPB published a blog post demonstrating its commitment to "a fair, transparent, and competitive auto lending market" by calling attention to add-on products...
United States Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On May 2, the CFPB published a blog post demonstrating its commitment to "a fair, transparent, and competitive auto lending market" by calling attention to add-on products for which auto dealers and finance companies "often charge consumers all payments for any add-on products as a lump sum at origination of the auto loan, and they generally include the lump sum cost as part of the total vehicle financing agreement."  CFPB examiners have focused on how servicers manage these add-on product charges when the loan ends prior to when the add-on product's potential benefits end.

The CFPB notes that its recent Supervisory Highlights reports that examiners found that servicers engaged in unfair practices by failing to request refunds from the third-party administrators for "unearned" fees after the consumer was no longer in possession of the vehicle. Examiners also found that some servicers engage in unfair acts or practices by miscalculating extended warranty products or other product refunds after repossession and attempting to collect miscalculated deficiency balances.

Putting It Into Practice:   This blog post represents the latest in a series of public warnings from the CFPB that it is closely monitoring auto industry conduct, especially as it relates to ensuring affordable credit, compliant servicing and collections, and fair competition (we recently discussed the CFPB's latest look at auto finance companies in previous blog posts here and here).   Auto finance companies should be mindful of these warnings and consider taking action to implement some of the best practices in this blog before becoming the subject of a supervisory examination or an enforcement action.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More