Highlights
This decision is largely viewed as an expansion of agency activities subject to ESA section 7 consultation. While only directly applicable in the Ninth Circuit, the decision has several potential significant implications:
- Thousands of agency decisions not previously considered to be "agency action" for purposes of section 7 consultation must now be considered "agency action," and thus subject to formal section 7 ESA consultation. Formal consultation is a time-intensive process involving agency review and preparation of a biological opinion, a process that takes, at a minimum, 135 days. These decisions largely fall into areas involving mining, water rights, and forestry, and will likely significantly delay agency decision-making.
- This delay will be compounded in light of the Services' ongoing budgetary restrictions and administrative burden imposed by the Fall 2011 settlement between USFWS and environmental organizations that requires USFWS to make listing decisions for hundreds of species on a court-imposed timeline.
- Due to the potential for significant impacts within and beyond the Ninth Circuit, and apparent conflict with established precedent in the Ninth and other circuits, this case is a prime candidate for U.S. Supreme Court review.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.