ARTICLE
10 September 2024

Federal Court Orders Re-Do Of Golden-Cheeked Warbler Petition Review

N
Nossaman LLP

Contributor

For more than 80 years, Nossaman LLP has delivered the highest quality legal expertise and policy advice to our clients nationwide. We focus on distinct areas of law and policy, as well as in specific industries, ranging from transportation, healthcare and energy to real estate development, water and government.
On September 5, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas held in General Land Office v. U.S. Department of the Interior, that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service...
United States Texas Environment
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On September 5, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas held in General Land Office v. U.S. Department of the Interior, that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) improperly denied a petition to delist the federally-endangered golden-cheeked warbler (Setophaga chrysoparia) (GCWA) by holding the petition to an unlawfully heightened standard at the initial, 90-day finding stage. As a result of the court's ruling, the Service is required to undertake a review of the GCWA delisting petition and make a 90-day finding as to whether the petition presents substantial information indicating that delisting may be warranted. If the Service finds in the affirmative, the agency must then make a 12-month finding as to whether delisting is warranted.

This is the second time the Service has been sued over its denial of the same GCWA delisting petition. In 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit similarly remanded a previous negative 90-day finding to the Service, requiring the agency to undertake a fresh review and issue a new 90-day finding. That new 90-day finding was the subject of General Land Office v. U.S. Department of the Interior. Pursuant to the court's order, the Service must now issue a new 90-day finding based on the appropriate standard (rather than the heightened standard the agency previously has applied).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More