ARTICLE
21 April 2023

New York Proposes Exemption From Bar To Contribution Claims For PFAS Cleanup

JD
Jones Day

Contributor

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,500 lawyers across five continents. The Firm is distinguished by a singular tradition of client service; the mutual commitment to, and the seamless collaboration of, a true partnership; formidable legal talent across multiple disciplines and jurisdictions; and shared professional values that focus on client needs.
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances ("PFAS") are synthetic chemicals with wide commercial and industrial applications, including firefighting foams, greaseproof food wrapping, nonstick cookware...
United States Environment
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The proposed amendment to NY law establishes a right to contribution for cost-recovery claims for settling parties in tort actions who clean up PFAS contamination.

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances ("PFAS") are synthetic chemicals with wide commercial and industrial applications, including firefighting foams, greaseproof food wrapping, nonstick cookware, water-repellent fabrics, carpets, and textiles.

On March 16, 2023, the New York State Assembly proposed an amendment to General Obligations Law §15-108 that would allow settling parties who incur cleanup costs for PFAS to seek contribution for those costs from other potentially responsible parties. In the absence of amendment, §15-108 prohibits a settling party from either suing or being sued for contribution.

The NY Legislature noted that although the stated purpose of §15-108 is to encourage settlement, in practice, §15-108's contribution bar discourages tort settlements in the environmental cleanup context and causes confusion when suits assert state law as well as federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA") causes of action.

Under CERCLA, also known as "Superfund," parties who settle federal claims involving the cleanup of "hazardous substances" can sue other potentially responsible parties for those parties' portion of the cleanup costs. But because PFAS are not defined as "hazardous substances" under CERCLA and many PFAS-related suits are brought by local governments on state law tort theories, parties who incur PFAS-related cleanup costs in New York may be limited to the contribution remedies provided by state law.

To address this tension, the proposed amendment to §15-108 adds an additional subdivision (e) exempting from that statute's contribution bar parties who clean up and settle PFAS-related tort actions. Legislators believe that, if enacted, this amendment would bring New York's tort contribution scheme in line with CERCLA, and allow settling parties who front the costs for PFAS-related cleanup to sue other responsible parties for their share of the costs.

The proposed amendment was referred to the NY Assembly's Judiciary Committee. If enacted, this amendment would be effective immediately and would apply to all pending New York tort claims involving PFAS cleanup.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More